Pre-submission review of your APC documents by a practising MRICS professional and experienced RICS APC Counsellor, Supervisor and Mentor. Structured critique of Summary of Experience, Case Study, CPD record, with competency mapping, evidence gap analysis, and bespoke question hooks. QS and PM pathways.
Every mandatory and technical competency reviewed against your written evidence. Indicators on strengths, and areas where assessors will likely probe.
Likely interview questions reverse-engineered from your submission. What an assessor would ask based on what you've written — including the uncomfortable ones.
Structured feedback report with issue register, priority actions, and risk flags. Clear success criteria for your revisions.
Review for inadvertent disclosure of client-sensitive information — a common referral trigger that candidates miss.
Your reviewer is a practising MRICS professional and experienced RICS APC Counsellor, Supervisor and Mentor, not a training company. Real-world perspective on whether your evidence demonstrates genuine competence.
Select Standard or Priority review. You'll receive a confirmation email with upload instructions.
Upload your APC documents (Word format preferred). Include your pathway, route, and any specific concerns.
Your documents are reviewed by an MRICS professional. Competency mapping, gap analysis, and question hooks prepared.
Receive your marked-up documents, evidence strength report, and bespoke question pack. Follow up via email.
The average APC candidate invests 2+ years of structured training. A professional document review costs less than a single day's annual leave.
